“A Critical Moment:” Clinic Attorneys Lend Their Expertise to Chicago Organizers as Protests Continue


By Shanice Harris

Social Justice Bluhm Legal Clinic Faculty
Photo by Dominique Robinson on Unsplash.

The attorneys at the Bluhm Legal Clinic are always busy—helping clients, teaching students, advocating policy, and fighting for justice—but the events of 2020 have contributed to what might be the Clinic’s most active year yet. In addition to their ongoing work related to the COVID-19 pandemic, faculty have been engaged in Chicago’s persistent protests of the racial injustice and police brutality that continues to be enacted against Black Americans throughout the country.


Sheila Bedi, clinical professor of law, has dedicated much of her career to social justice, but she doesn’t underestimate the gravity of the present moment. “The current civil uprisings and protests against police brutality have been called the world’s largest social justice movement of all time,” she says. “It’s a critical moment.” Bedi is one of the Clinic attorneys representing the Campbell Coalition—a conglomerate compromised of several local organizations, including Black Lives Matter Chicago, the Brighton Park Neighborhood Council, the Chicago Urban League, Justice for Families, the 411 movement for Pierre Loury, Network 49, the Chicago West Side Branch of the NAACP and the Women’s All Points Bulletin.

Early this spring, after the death of George Floyd at the hands of police officers in Minnesota, thousands took to the streets to express their continued frustration with police brutality in America. Many Chicagoans felt a twisted kinship to the matter, with their own decades-long frustrations with the Chicago Police Department. In the days following Floyd’s death, protests took place at Buckingham Foundation, Grant Park, and much of downtown, where crowds were met with cops in tactical gear who allegedly enacted violence on the peaceful protestors.

Bedi and her team went to work, and soon a lawsuit, State of Illinois v. City of Chicago, was filed. In August, United States District Court Judge Hon. Robert M. Dow, Jr. oversaw a two-day special session to hear testimonials from several of the organizers associated with the Campbell Coalition. The virtual hearing was to discuss the topic of the Chicago Police Department’s response to protesters. Speakers included Bedi, who represented the Campbell Coalition; Karen Sheley from the ACLU in Illinois; and Shareese Pryor, Chief of the Civil Rights Bureau at the Illinois Attorney General’s office. “CPD’s protest response revealed its propensity to engage in the exact behavior that inspired these global protests,” Bedi said as she introduced her clients during the first day of the hearing. “People from all walks of life and backgrounds will be here as they were during the protest. And they will describe how CPD officers systematically abused their authority, used lethal force, sprayed them with chemical restraints that cause excruciating pain, unlawfully detained them, and mocked those who were bloody, crying out in pain, and begging CPD to recognize their humanity.”

Over 50 Chicagoans spoke during the hearing, ranging from social workers to college students—all protestors voicing their concerns. According to their testimonies, officers demonstrated excessive force, which in some cases resulted in serious injuries, confiscating or destroying protesters’ personal property including cell phones and cameras, failing to or refusing to provide medical care, and denying protesters access to counsel. “These violations have been widely publicized, and in their response, the City of Chicago shirks responsibility and issues blame,” Bedi continued. “It has defended the use of lethal force by characterizing protesters as aggressors. But this blame game misses a fundamental point. This, and indeed the Constitution itself, protect the people against the power of the police.”

Vanessa del Valle, clinical assistant professor of law; Alexa Van Brunt, clinical associate professor of law; and several students at Northwestern Pritzker School of Law have also lent their expertise to the fight against police brutality in Chicago. Students including Terah Tollner (JD ’21), Jay Trewn (JD ‘21), Luke Fernbach (JD ‘21), and Lorellee Kampschnieder (JD ‘22) have interviewed protestors, documented the behavior of the Chicago Police Department (CPD) and prepped for legal action against the city.


The Clinic has also been working with grassroots organizations who are leading the movement, to help them craft legislation to push forward to city council. “[We’re] working with them to develop strategic plans, so both identifying what has gone wrong with policing in such a fundamental way, but also providing the solutions and building up a kind of world that the organizers are envisioning,” Bedi says. In addition to the organizations in the Campbell Coalition, the Clinic’s staff and students have worked with GoodKids MadCity and Black Abolitionist Network. Bedi stresses that the Clinic’s work with protestors is all about supporting the vision of the activists and assisting anywhere they can. “Whether it’s developing litigation strategies, or drafting ordinances, or even doing some strategic planning, that’s the goal our students have taken on.”

During Northwestern Law’s academic panel on the Breonna Taylor grand jury verdict in October, Bedi spoke about the need to divest from police and reinvest in community needs. One of the community organizations that the Clinic has been working with, GoodKids MadCity, has thought up several innovative ways that the city can invest in community-based discipline that don’t involve the need for an armed officer. “Things like block-by-block councils where [residents] are able to build out what the community needs. Whether it’s a safe place to recreate, whether it’s jobs, whether it’s a place to cool off, mental health counseling, addiction services,” Bedi says. “And the idea is meeting people where they are, building community, and building on the strengths of that community.” She acknowledges that the reimagining of the justice system will take time, but she is confident that we can make immediate steps to drive some of the massive police budget to community organizations. Some city council members, such as Rossana Rodriguez-Sanchez (33rd ward), and members of the Chicago Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), are being responsive to the movement.

Some of the young people the Clinic represent have suggested a peace book, which would lift up the young people throughout the city that are involved in peace-building activities. This would be a direct opposition to the infamous gang book that the City of Chicago maintains, which lists all of the people that CPD believe are involved in gang activity. “We institutionalize and demonize young black and brown people, and that has created overcriminalization,” Bedi says. “But there are no state resources that go into lifting up and celebrating the young Black and Brown people who are doing the work of peace building every day.”


This isn’t the first time in recent history that the Chicago Police Department has found itself in hot water with its citizens. In 2019, the state of Illinois and the city of Chicago entered a consent decree committed to constitutional and effective law enforcement after protests arose in 2015. “This decree only exists because five years ago, Chicagoans took their demands for justice from the street to the city council in the names of Laquan McDonald, Rekia Boyd, and so many other Black and Brown people killed or brutalized by the Chicago Police Department in recent history,” Bedi said during the hearing. “This consent decree could be, and it should be, an antidote to the poison of police lawlessness that has infected Chicago for well over 100 years, but it has failed.”

The decree, with was signed by Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr., was supposed to “ensure that the City and CPD deliver services in a manner that fully complies with the Constitution and laws of the United States and the State of Illinois, respects the rights of the people of Chicago, builds trust between officers and the communities they serve, and promotes community and officer safety,” according to the decree’s language. CPD’s refusal to comply—and the Chicago Police Department (CPD) Independent Monitoring Team’s affirmation of this fact—is what prompted Bedi and the coalition to bring a case against the City of Chicago. The Independent Monitoring Team is responsible for assessing the CPD’s and the City of Chicago’s (City’s) compliance with the required elements of the Consent Decree.

“CPD officers refuse to wear body cameras. They use slurs and hate speech. They refuse to accurately report uses of force,” Bedi said. “And in the absence of decisive, immediate action, the summer of 2020 will be remembered as just one more spike, one more wave, one more peak on the deadly timeline of CPD’s failure to make Black lives matter…or this summer could go down in history as a turning point and a time of transformation.”


As the energy continues into the winter months, Bedi is confident that activists have no plans on slowing down. In fact, the Clinic and their clients have already taken their next steps. On behalf of 60 plaintiffs, many of whom made their voices heard in that initial hearing in August, the MacArthur Justice Center (along with the People’s Law Office) filed a federal lawsuit in November against several Chicago police officers. Just as they did in the hearing, they are alleging unlawful arrest, brutality, and mistreatment by the named officers in those days following the death of Floyd, according to the Chicago Tribune. “Chicago has been the epicenter of the fight for racial justice and the fight against white supremacy that has been involved in policing since its inception,” Bedi says. “So the organizing that is happening right now, the uprisings that have been happening, are a result of years and years of work.”